WARRANT
[email protected] → Open the demo →
Public register · 3 filings · 2 jurisdictions
REVISED 2026-08-06 · STATUSES CHECKED AGAINST EACH VENUE

The regulatory record, as filed.

Warrant Labs is on the record with three filings across two jurisdictions: two contributions to the EU AI Office's targeted consultation on the draft Article 6(5) high-risk classification guidelines, and one response to the Reserve Bank of India's draft model risk management guidance. Each entry below states what was filed, the question it answered, the reference id the venue issued, the date, and whether the venue publishes contributions. None of the three does — so nothing on this page links to a submission, and no link is implied.

Filed · 2026-06-02 · EU AI Office

EU AI Act · draft Article 6(5) classification guidelines.

Venue
EU AI Office (European Commission) · targeted consultation.
Instrument
Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6(5) of the EU AI Act · §§ 75, 76 and 90 of the draft guidelines.
Question filed
Where does a separable, after-the-fact record-producing component sit in the high-risk classification — inside the agentic system under §§ 75 and 90 of the draft guidelines, or genuinely separable under § 76?
Reference
Contribution a39b0f7e-0e8b-48b7-ad3a-d4b50741b30fID AS ISSUED BY EUSURVEY ON SUBMISSION
Publication status
Not published by venue. The consultation ran as an anonymous questionnaire, and the venue publishes only a final summary report — none published as of 2026-08-06. Filed on the consultation record; confirmation archived.
Filed · 2026-07-23 · EU AI Office

Same consultation, supplementary contribution.

Venue
EU AI Office (European Commission) · the same consultation as the entry above, whose response window was extended to 23 July 2026.
Instrument
Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6(5) of the EU AI Act — the same draft the entry above addresses.
Question filed
What must the record itself be — "records were kept" is not the same property as records that survive examination by a party that does not trust the keeper.
Reference
Contribution b0f64301-4440-41f2-b27b-e90aae37e3f9ID AS ISSUED BY EUSURVEY ON SUBMISSION
Publication status
Not published by venue — as the entry above. Filed on the consultation record; confirmation archived.
Filed · 2026-07-23 · Reserve Bank of India

RBI · draft model risk management guidance.

Venue
Reserve Bank of India · Connect 2 Regulate consultation portal.
Instrument
Draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management, 2026 (Press Release 2026-2027/528) · paragraphs 8, 45 and 48(ii).
Question filed
Should the framework require a discrete, attributable record for each material automated decision, examinable independently of the model provider?
Reference
Public Consultation C2R/2026-27/487THE PORTAL ISSUES NO PER-SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NUMBER
Publication status
Not published by venue. Connect 2 Regulate lists draft documents and comment windows only; received comments are not published (checked 2026-08-06). Filed on the consultation record.
Register note

Reference ids are stated as issued by each venue. Where a venue does not publish contributions, none is linked and none is implied. Statuses as of 2026-08-06.

Each id is checkable by the venue that issued it. The consultation the EU pair answers closed on 23 July 2026; when the Commission publishes its final summary report, this register will cite it as the consultation's outcome document — after opening it, and dated. That report will be aggregate: it will not name respondents, and it will not change any filing's publication status.