Warrant is regulator-grade evidence infrastructure for AI agents in regulated industries: drop an agent's execution trace, get a record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation, independently verifiable without contacting Warrant.
drop your AI agent's execution trace. get a record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation, and to NYDFS Part 500, SR 11-7, FCA Consumer Duty, RBI FREE-AI, SEBI, India DPDP, MAS FEAT. in 60 seconds.
one PDF. the trace's actions, mapped per-action to the article numbers that govern them — a record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation. it is independently verifiable without contacting Warrant, so any auditor can confirm it for themselves.
one trace in, one PDF out. the record states, per action the agent took, whether it stayed within purpose, whether the obligation was met, and the article number that governs it — a record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation.
end-to-end target on the sample traces · 60 seconds. trace truncation cap · 80,000 characters. the resulting record is independently verifiable without contacting Warrant.
status reflects production coverage as of 2026-05-08. mapping is article-level. nine regimes across six jurisdictions. the scope is fixed in writing on the artefact itself.
Reg. (EU) 2024/1689, Art. 12(1) · Art. 13 · automatic event recording over the lifetime of high-risk systems. enforcement 2026-08-02 (provisional deferral to 2027-12-02 pending OJEU). penalty up to 3% turnover or €15M under Art. 99(4).
Art. 12(1) · Art. 13 · enforcement 2026-08-02 (provisional deferral to 2027-12-02 pending OJEU) · penalty 3% turnover or €15M (Art. 99(4))Reg. (EU) 2024/1689, Art. 13 § 1–3 · transparency obligations toward downstream deployers. instructions for use, capabilities, limitations, oversight measures.
Art. 13(1) · Art. 13(2) · Art. 13(3) · enforcement 2026-08-02 (provisional deferral to 2027-12-02 pending OJEU)Principles for Businesses Sourcebook · Principle 12 and PRIN 2A. outcomes monitoring, support for retail customers, adverse-action disclosure. PS22/9 published 27 July 2022.
PRIN 2A.1.1R · Principle 12 · PS22/923 NYCRR Part 500 · audit trail, cybersecurity-event notification, annual certification, covered-entity scope. Oct 2024 industry letter applies the rule to AI deployments.
§ 500.6(a)(2) · § 500.17(a)(1) · § 500.17(b)(2) · § 500.1(e/f/k)Federal Reserve Supervisory Letter SR 11-7 · the bank's "model risk management framework" verbatim, ongoing monitoring of model performance and stability. SR 26-2 carry-forward for AI. GAO B-331324.
SR 11-7 · § III.B · SR 26-2 · GAO B-331324Reserve Bank of India · Framework for Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI · Committee Report released 13 August 2025. principles for regulated entities, lifecycle controls, audit obligations.
RBI FREE-AI · 13 Aug 2025Securities and Exchange Board of India · Retail Algorithmic Trading Framework. February 2025 circular plus September 2025 extension. mandatory 1 April 2026. today is post-enforcement.
Feb 2025 + Sep 2025 circulars · mandatory 1 April 2026Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 · § 8(3) accuracy of personal data used for decisions affecting the data principal · § 8(5) reasonable security safeguards by the data fiduciary.
DPDP Act 2023 · § 8(3) accuracy · § 8(5) safeguardsMonetary Authority of Singapore · Fairness, Ethics, Accountability, Transparency principles for AI in finance. published 2018. principles guidance, not binding rule. Veritas toolkit operationalises the four principles.
MAS FEAT · published 2018 · Veritas toolkitanyone can, in under a minute, with no account and no API key. paste a package id or upload the PDF. the artefact is independently verifiable without contacting Warrant. it passes or it fails. there is no third option.
Yes. Package 7de85ceaeac42a47 was entered into the public record on 2026-04-29 against an EU/DE-BaFin lending advisory trace.
It is a record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation.
Anyone with an internet connection can confirm it is independently verifiable without contacting Warrant.
WARRANT
7de85ceaeac42a47
A record mapped to a specific EU AI Act obligation, independently verifiable without contacting Warrant.
we name the perimeter so the regulator can read it. the artefact is precise about what it asserts and silent on what it does not.
High-risk AI systems shall technically allow for the automatic recording of events ('logs') over the lifetime of the system. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 · Article 12(1) · 13 June 2024
three steps from one sentence in Article 12(1) to the EUR 15 million ceiling. Article 12 binds the system. Article 16(c) reads it back as a provider obligation. Article 99(4) sets the fineable consequence at the higher of EUR 15 million or 3 percent of global turnover.
one trace JSON, one PDF, sixty seconds. independently verifiable without contacting Warrant. the citations name the article. the artefact reads in court.
Compliance officer, deployer engineer, regulator, builder — tell us who you are and we'll write back within 48h. Two fields. No sequence drip. No newsletter.